Monday, December 19, 2005

Ethical Investing on CSMonitor

Where Capital meets Conscience

Today, I discovered 'Ethical Investing', a very interesting section on the site of the csmonitor. Webcasts and a Ethical Market Monitor Index and many interesting informations are available. Though, most of them obviously US-centered. Howeveer it seems worth to spend some time on it. Among others, the section offers in December:

- If ethical dollars can change manufacturing and banking, can they improve the media, too?

- Why corporations now must compete on social and environmental issues

-A seal of approval for companies' social progress

Social Capitalist Awards 2006

Introducing the 2006 Social Capitalist Award winners--25 entrepreneurs solving the world's toughest problems with creativity, ingenuity, and passion. Because they can't stand a vacuum.

The entrepreneurial mind abhors a vacuum. Market failures, unmet demand, even the maddening lure of a blank napkin--all beckon as explicit invitations to invent. What defines an entrepreneur (as well as an entrepreneurial organization) is that relentless problem-solving approach, not the specifics of the problem itself.

We typically associate such ingenuity with the transformation of problems into lucrative, shareholder-enriching companies. But the winners and nominees of the Social Capitalist Award 2006, a joint effort by Fast Company and Monitor Group, the global consulting firm, belong to the cream of entrepreneurial organizations in the social sector.

Like their counterparts in the profit-driven world, our 25 winning organizations--winnowed from 278 nominations with the help of 43 experts--are masters at envisioning products and services that don't yet exist, marshaling resources, and crafting solutions that deeply affect their customers. The results these nonprofit organizations deliver hinge on business acumen and often reflect strategies that their for-profit brethren would do well to imitate.

Earl Martin Phalen, the founder of winner BELL (Building Educated Leaders for Life), came face-to-face with his inspiring vacuum while still a student at Harvard Law School. Phalen and several classmates volunteered for a mentoring program in Roxbury, Massachusetts. He remembers telling the kids, most of them from low-income African-American and Latino families, that anything was possible, including going to college. But when he and his law-school buddies sat down to help the students with homework, they realized the kids were years behind academically. "We left there really devastated," he says.

Read on to know what he and others made out of such insipring vacuums.

Saturday, December 17, 2005

Trust is declining

A global public opinion survey carried out for the World Economic Forum in 20 countries, interviewing more than 20,000 citizens, paints an alarming picture of declining levels of trust. The survey, carried out by GlobeScan, shows that trust in a range of institutions has dropped significantly since January 2004 to levels not seen since the months following the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks. The poll also reveals that public trust in national governments and the United Nations has fallen the most over the past two years.

Want to read more

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

CSFB gets fire from environmentalists


One of the big swiss financial institutions, Credit Suisse, gets criticism because it serves as financial advisor to one of Shell's oil project in Sakhalin Island, Russia's Far East and home to the world's last population of critically endangered Western Gray Whales.

Protest sparked off from US (RAN, Pacific Environment) to Switzerland (Greenpeace). The issue has also been commented by some swiss bloggers.

Will CSFB take up the issue and react? Will they consider whether this project respects their business ethics or not?

With regard to Shell - for them the challenge is ongoing. In one of the previous posts (Accountability Rating 2005) you will notice that the Oil companies made it to the top: the Royal Dutch Shell Group succeding to be ranked number 2, behind BP. Will they reconsider this project?

Where does the business need to stop? A tough line to draw...

The Geography of Corporate Giving


A new US study shows the geographical location of Company Headquarters influences the types of social programs it sponsors.

On HBSWK you can read an interesting interview with Christopher de Marquis, one of the authors of the study.

He suggests that there are three main factors that influence corporations to follow locally established patterns: 1) what is encouraged and supported by government, 2) what peers are doing locally, 3) what is believed 'right'.

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Accountability Rating 2005


European firms do better than their US competitors

The Accountability Rating tool is a temptative to measure which businesses align their strategies with society's needs, and which are paying only lip service to their responsibilities. It was developped by the csrnetwork and AccountAbility, a UK-based thinktank.

Their summary of this years' result:
The average overall score among Fortune Global 100 companies has risen from 24 in 2004 to 32 (out of a maximum of 100). One-third of companies achieved a score of 40 or more, compared with only one in ten in 2004.

The range of performance across the Global 100 is wide, stretching from only one point to a top score of 78. In general, scores remain disturbingly low. The results suggest that few of today’s biggest companies are as smart as they might be. The gap between the leaders and the laggards raises important questions about the latter’s ability to manage their risks and opportunities.


Read more

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Competency Framework

The CSR academy let's you download its Competency Framework as free pdf. It's objective is to help you integrate CSR in your organisation and provides a set of core characteristics to help managers to integrate responsible business decision-making.

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Roche and its heavy burden with Tamiflu


Another interesting article from Ethical Corporation on the huge responsability faced by Roche with its anti-flu drug Tamiflu.

Though they have learned some lessons from past experiences with AIDS-drugs, a mistake in handling supplies could have fatal consequences for the company's reputation.

Read article...

Nestlé's move into Fairtrade

Nestlé recently announced to produce a fair trade coffee. A columnist from the 'Ethical Corporation' on Nestlé's difficulty to get acceptance for that...
Read more here

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Looking for a quick fix - Social Audits no help


The guardian on a report arguing that a majority of social audits are missing violations of workers' rights. A recommendation from the report is to place workers and unions at the centre of the auditing process and makes the case for a more comprehensive approach.

Positive mentions of well-known brands as Gap, Nike and Reebook.

Read the article of the Guardian


The report from the clean-clothes campaign

Saturday, October 01, 2005

They don't know what they are negotiating


Intellectual property rights and wrong

An interesting confession made by the economist and nobel laureate Joseph E Stiglitz: he admits that the diplomats did not know what they were doing when they negotiated the TRIPS* agreement during the Uruguay - Round.

[* (trade related aspects of intellectual property rights)]

"I suspect that most of those who signed the agreement did not fully understand what they were doing. If they had, would they have willingly condemned thousands of AIDS sufferers to death because they might no longer be able to get affordable generic drugs? Had the question been posed in this way to parliaments around the world, I believe that TRIPS would have been soundly rejected."
The only thing they knew, he is saying...
"it was clear that there was more interest in pleasing the pharmaceutical and entertainment industries than in ensuring an intellectual-property regime that was good for science, let alone for developing countries."
But it is exactly here where the debate on CSR has to start: . Ethics vs Profits, how to combine Social Responsibility with market objectives. It's a difficult challenge..

But, let's hop that WIPO [World Intellectual Property Organization] will succeed when trying to build a more development oriented IP regime. At least, it is on their agenda now.

Read Stiglitz yourself:
http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/a2k/2005-August/000555.html

or in German:
http://www.ftd.de/me/cl/19245.html

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

Doing Well by Doing Good 2005:

Corporate citizenship turns consumers into brand champions

After the various scandals that destroyed much of the credibility that Corporate America had once, it takes time to rebuild trust. Golin Harris recently published its national Corporate Social Responsibility Survey 2005 and comes to think that the worst might be over and that there could be a glimmer of hope on the horizon of Corporate America. After Enron & Co., it was not surprising that americans took time before trusting their business leaders again. Not surprising either, that US business now leads the way and fights the battle to win back the confidence of consumers, clients and shareholders: The introduction of new Corporate Governance regulations, new accounting standards and impressive CSR-policies are the result.

And does it start to pay off? It might do so actually.

Here you find the Executive Summary of the study

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

Nestle - Corporate Governance under pressure


The Nestle case is another good example that even on such a big multinational company external pressure is showing impact. Public opinion forms reputation and reputation is intangible but influences the stock prize.

It all started with the Annual Shareholder meeting where CEO, Mr. Brabeck, was succeding Rainer Gut as the board chairman and by doing that was holding a double mandat. A 'sin' according to widely admitted good governance principles. But there was some opposition, a small shareholder - the Ethos Fund and its manager Mr. Biedermann - started to organize the fight for good governance at Nestle. However, it was a kind of David against Goliath play.

Of course the Goliath, Mr. Brabeck, was not worried at all by this small David, Mr. Biedermann. He seemed just furious, arrogant and threatenend to step down if someone dared to contest seriously its double mandate. [Read the summary of the NZZ, 13 April 2005]

In the end, the shareholder assembly accepted - but only temporarily! - the double mandate of Goliath. However, surprisingly, more people in the assembly then expected were backing the fight of David. And it looked a lot as if Mr. Biedermann will get more support next time.

Afterwards, it seems as if there were some people having an open and honest word with Goliath, warning him that being too arrogant with little Davids could end up with some serious problems. And there were changes: Nestle is now surveying its shareholder to get their opinion on good governance!

Bravo David Biedermann! This is a promising start.
Interested readers can find David under ethosfund.ch

Saturday, August 27, 2005

Fade, Integrate or Transform ? The future of CSR

A very interesting paper written by Allen White, Senior Advisor, BSR! He envisions three scenarios for the CSR movement by 2015: Fade, Integrate or Transform . In the same times, it gives you the history of CSR in a nutshell.
Up to us and the business leaders to choose which of the scenarios should become reality. At the end he summarizes the core challenge of CSR very well in this words:
The core question facing companies is how to harness the full potential of business to serve the public interest while preserving and enhancing core assets — creativity, innovation and competitive drive.
The 10 pages paper can be downloaded here

CSR - positive signs for the future



No it's not a graphic on my stocks.. just a research result on the last six months using BlogPulse Intelliseek.
The postings are slightly rising - with some peaks - but not really a bullish market trend yet. However, enough to stay optimistic.






Another study hinting also on the more prominent role in the future for CSR - at least that's the results of a study by the Bertelsmann Foundations asking german managers what they consider to be the role of CSR during the years to come: 67% say they think it will become more important. Want to know more? Go here

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

CSR at Nike: Transparency - A small but important step forward

It's not hot news.. but I thought, I mention it here...

Nike - as part of its Corporate Responsibility Report - released last April its Factory Adresses for Nike branded products. This is a concrete move and "a small but important step forward" as puts it 'NikeWatch', a labour right's campaign sponsored by Oxfam Australia. You can read their comment on this in their May Newsletter

By the way, Nike has put a lot of nice and interesting material online, outlining their approach to CSR. It's worth a look: Nikebiz - Responsibility

Yes indeed, I think public pressure and the constant NGO-campaigning provided some incentive for Nike to move in this direction. Looking forward to discover the next steps...

Monday, August 15, 2005

KPMG survey says CSR entered mainstream in industrialized countries

that's the main result of the

KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005 - June 2005
[You can download the report as a PDF-File ]

That's good news for a start... will be interesting to find out if the impact of reporting will go beyond reporting and touch future corporate behaviour.

Thursday, August 11, 2005

Good start...

" 'To be ethical is profitable, but to be ethical because it is profitable is not ethical.' And, one might add, it is also not profitable in the long run." Peter Forstmoser, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Swiss Re, citing Peter Koestenbaum (Heart of Business, Ethics, Power and Philosophy, Saybrook Press, 1987)

an interesting statement that gives a good start for an interesting read: "Thinking Ethics - How Ethical Values and Standards are Changing", Ed. Beth Krasna, London, Profile Books, 2005.

To find out more, visit www.profilebooks.com

Actually the book was edited on a basis of a 'Thinking Ethics' seminar, held in Geneva in February 2005. The seminar was organized on the initiative of PHILIAS, a swiss NPO describing itself as the SWISS REFERENCE POINT ON CSR - TO PROMOTE AND IMPLEMENT SOCIAL CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

Sorry

In case someone visited corpethics and hoped to find new stuff... SORRY. I am still in the stage of figuring out how to make this best work...
and also looking a bit for more convenient software.. for instance,... if I start putting down my thoughts and reading, I would like to categorize stuff.. and with this blogger, I am not sure yet if I can do this..

anyway, will try to be more consistent and updated..

Tuesday, August 02, 2005

CSR - marketing or serious business?

CSR - only a marketing tool, or an ethical approach that is really lived by big business. I am still undecided and not sure what to think.

How to decide? What would be credible criterias; how to measure whether it is good PR emphasizing brand/reputation management for the corporation or a genuine ethical business approach?

Isn't any CSR just good.. and more would be better? Where are the problems starting with CSR, and where does it become inacceptablel?

This and more I want to reflect on... and of course, any input will make it more interesting..