corpethics stands for corporate and ethics. I'd like to keep track of thoughts and information related to business ethics, philantropic initiatives and real-life business practices. This should help answer the question: Are CSR and philantropic initiatives good tools to ensure business is done in an ethical way
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Is Switzerland a paradise for corruption?
The focus is on Sports Associations, in particular the never ending polemics with the FIFA...
Corruption is not illegal in Switzerland when it comes to sports associations..
The media point to other facts that show that image of Switzerland is currently suffering...
- Ranking of Transparency International
-Fifa, Uefa and IOC
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Taking a tough lesson.. on Facebook
Greenpeace has definitely landed a coup with their PalmOil Campaing and the famours video... more on this from Greenpeace UK
Read this very informative posts on TruhtyPR.. a quite good analysis of what happened
So what's the lesson? You can't control communication on social Media... only influence a bit... tough lesson for a giant..
Creating Shared Value
Found this on Nestle.ch"Creating Shared Value is a very different approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR), because it is not focused on meeting a set of standard external criteria, or on philanthropy. The idea of winners and losers doesn’t fit this model of CSR."Read more about Nestlé'a approach to corporate social responsibility on nestle.com. Mark Kramer, Harvard University
Missions statement of CSV
Nestle adapts the communication to the web...
18-09-2010 01:01 Nestle Adapts To Web, Supply Challenges
By Agnese Smith
ZURICH (MarketWatch)--Swiss food giant Nestle (NSRGY) is having a good year.
Not only has the maker of KitKat chocolate bars, Gerber baby foods and Nespresso coffee recently reported better-than-expected financial results but also, it is enjoying an improved public image thanks to changes that highlight its increased concern about the environment and its relationship with some of its suppliers.
The company may have little choice. The threat of disruption in the supply of raw materials has forced international corporations such as Nestle to focus on ensuring future sources rather than paying lower prices in the short-term. The growing use of social media forums like Facebook and Twitter, and other Internet sites, has given Nestle an incentive to polish its image. Together, those factors might push the world's largest food maker to adopt a more enlightened self-interest.
"This is crucial," said Marco Gulpers, senior equity strategist at ING in the Netherlands, referring to Nestle's increased environmental and public awareness. "Sourcing could become constrained and companies that source well and market well will be the clear winners."
During the past few years, many raw materials prices have surged, thanks in part to rising consumption in Asia, where many economies are racing ahead. Prices for coffee and cocoa, two commodities that are essential for Nestle, have been on the rise for years. Coffee hit a high of $1.94 a pound on Sept. 14, its highest level since September 1997. Cocoa, which hit a record in December, has fallen back but is still trading at lofty levels.
The same is true for the price of wheat. A drought and wildfires in Russia have destroyed as much as a third of this year's wheat crop. Russia, one of the world's biggest wheat exporters, last month imposed an export ban, which sparked supply fears and drove prices sharply higher.
China recently surpassed Japan as the world's second-largest economy after the US, while economic growth in India continues to expand its middle class. The prospect of more increases in demand in the world's largest population centers and weather-related crop failures have sparked concern over global food supplies. Sustainability is back on the agenda both for the public and corporations.
Shared Value
For several years, Nestle has been promoting its Creating Shared Value philosophy, which maintains that it is in the corporation's best interest to develop bonds with the societies in which it works. "In order to create long-term value for our shareholders, we must at the same time create value for society at large," Nestle says in its literature.
The focus is on nutrition, water and sustainable rural development. Nestle says it's the same philosophy that has guided the company since the 1860s, when Henri Nestle developed a formula for babies who couldn't breast-feed.
But the sight of orangutan-suited Greenpeace activists disrupting its annual shareholder meeting and an Internet advertising campaign that features bloody orangutan fingers might also be a motivation. Earlier this year, Greenpeace staged several well-publicized demonstrations accusing Nestle of contributing to destroying orangutan habitat in Indonesia through its use of palm oil. More than a million people reportedly watched related videos on YouTube. The videos led to much vitriol against Nestle on social networking sites such as Facebook. Nestle declined to comment for this article.
Following the protests and the Internet response, Nestle said it was inviting a not-for-profit group to audit its supply chain and promised to end contracts with any company found to be chopping down rainforests to produce the oil. NGOs around the globe welcomed the move.
"Recently, the share of positive news compared to the negatives has increased," said Antoine Mach at Geneva-based Covalence, which measures corporate ethics. "In other words, the ethical reputation of Nestle has improved."
Nestle recently said it plans to invest half a billion dollars over the next 10 years to help coffee farmers. The company said it will provide technical assistance and high-yield, disease-resistant trees. It will also purchase more coffee directly from producers. The moves follow a plan to assist cocoa farmers in Ivory Coast, among the world's largest producers of the beans.
Observers say it's difficult to assess to what extent Nestle's CSV platform permeates the company and guides executives' overall strategy--or even if shareholders care about anti-corporate actions such as boycotts so long as the company does well. Nestle shares have risen about 7% so far this year while Switzerland's stocks market has fallen.
Battling Boycotts
While Nestle is popular with the financial community--it ranks among the most admired companies by business leaders, according to Fortune magazine--lots of people still loathe it.
As the world's largest provider of baby food, Nestle is roundly condemned by those who oppose the marketing of breast-milk substitutes. Breast-feeding activists such as Baby Milk Action in the UK accuse Nestle of failing to follow international guidelines on baby formula marketing, particularly in developing countries, and have sought to widen a boycott of Nestle products.
More worrying for Nestle, the boycott, which has been going on in various forms for more than three decades, has gained the support of some fairly influential--and mainstream--parenting forums like Mumsnet in the UK. The Internet group's public influence in Britain was illustrated in the last election, which was called by some "the Mumsnet election." Until last month, Mumsnet displayed the 'Ban Nestle' logo prominently on its home page. Managers are currently reviewing this policy pending talks with Baby Milk Action next month.
"Many of our members feel strongly about the way Nestle promotes formula milk in the developing world," said co-founder and managing director Justine Roberts. "Mumsnet is here to make parents' lives easier and we don't think Nestle's actions are compatible with that goal so we would rather not do business with them."
While Covalence's Mach says "noise" regarding Nestle's formula business has decreased in the past few years, it wouldn't take much to stoke interest. A number of parenting bloggers have registered their disapproval of people who do business with Nestle and criticized other bloggers. Even Hollywood star George Clooney, the face of Nestle's highly profitable Nespresso coffee system, has been criticized for his part in the successful coffee ads.
The Past Is Present
Part of the problem is that thanks to the Internet, Nestle's previous gaffes and public-relations breakdowns are all recorded and easily accessible. Just as individuals can no longer erase their past, companies are stuck with their histories.
One need only look at Wikipedia to get an illustration of the problem. Information about boycotts of Nestle products is prominent. The Internet also makes it easy to find news about one of the more cringe-inducing events, which occurred in 2002.
As Ethiopia suffered drought and famine that year, Nestle reportedly forced the cash-starved government to pay a nationalization fine that related to a German company it had taken over. Nestle said at the time that it was the principle of the matter, though it later claimed it was intending to give the money to charity all along.
How Nestle handles the relatively new forum of social media will also become increasingly important as it faces its critics.
The company's record so far suggests it will be a challenge to adjust. During the palm-oil demonstrations, discussions on Nestle's fan page on Facebook reportedly became heated, particularly after the company tried to force YouTube to remove the orangutan advertisements.
The incidents illustrate the difficulties facing consumer companies as they try to cope with news that goes instantly viral. And once an item is on the Internet or part of a Twitter feed, there it remains until something comes along to replace it.
In a recent report entitled The Third Industrial Revolution, ING's Gulpers wrote that food producers will materially benefit from efforts to act responsibly because an ever-growing number of sustainability-aware consumers will demand it.
"A revolution in marketing/sales is coming," Gulpers wrote in the report published in March. Many people "are no longer willing to compromise on responsible behavior from companies."
-Agnese Smith; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com
Click here to go to Dow Jones NewsPlus, a web front page of today's most important business and market news, analysis and commentary: http://www.djnewsplus.com/access/al?rnd=sr0MJPxC06UAEjBXFmNPcw%3D%3D. You can use this link on the day this article is published and the following day.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 17, 2010 19:01 ET (23:01 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2010 Dow Jones & Company, I
Saturday, September 18, 2010
The third industrial Revolution
| The four pillars of the industrial Revolution: Renewalble energies, positive power construction, hydrogen storage and smart grids |
Mor Information on these reflections on the site: http://www.foet.org/tir_materials.html
Saturday, May 15, 2010
How to appear socially responsible?
in such a situation: Impossible I'd say ...
[Picture found on 'tages-anzeiger.ch': Paresh Nath, The Khaleej Times, UAE]
Sunday, May 09, 2010
Creating Shared Value

The Nestle approach to CSR is interesting... and the quote below is quite telling... sounds good, no...
For a business to be successful in the long term, it must create value not only for its shareholders but also for society.creatingsharedvalue.org, About CSV « Creating Shared Value
Tuesday, May 04, 2010
Bonus - n'either ethical, nor good
A management professor from the University of Zurich puts it bluntly:"Stop the bonuses, they are no good!"
Margret Osterloh says, they have analyzed in a study over 123'000 firms and found no evidence that paying bonuses is enhancing economical performance.
I think, a good argument to think about...
Source: L'hebdo
Monday, January 05, 2009
New year - new try... ;-)
I need still some thinking, if I keep it in the same line, or if I want to give it a new angle to it. We'll see what happens.
For all who read this by any chance: Happy New year ;-)
Thursday, December 28, 2006
"Richesse oblige"
The objectives sound ambitious*:
-foster awareness of the interdependence which results from globalization and help develop an ethical approach of it;
-in Switzerlandd: foster knowledge about economic developments in a time of globalization
Wikipedia quotes Wuffli as: "A company is only as ethical as its people".
It seems that UBS is taking ethics more seriously as of today. To be continued...
Saturday, December 09, 2006
A sustainable entrepreneur

There is an interesting article in the Swiss paper 'Neue Zürcher Zeitung', which highlights the work of the ARVINA foundation, founded by the swiss entrepreneur and philantrop Stephan Schmidheiny.
The foundation is promoting sustainable development throughout Latin America supporting civil society actors. AVINA believes in a bottom-up approach and supports many small initiatives, organisations etc.
AVINA formulates its strategy like this:
We facilitate links among individuals committed to sustainable development by promoting the creation of increasingly constructive and inclusive communities.AVINA gets its financial resources from the VIVA Trust, again founded by Stephan Schmidheyni.
Working with our partners, we identify opportunities, build agendas for social transformation, promote responsible citizenship and seek to expand social capital in order to contribute to the construction of more sustainable societies"
If you read german, read the piece the NZZ-piece otherwise go to the website of the Foundation.
Friday, December 08, 2006
Communications: A deafening silence?

Yes, there is often silence, when it comes to communicating about environmental and sustainability issues.
Hey come on Communicators you have something some responsibility to this..and you have something to say there.
And say it loud and clearly to your TopManagement:
It is not enough to pay lipservice. It needs 'action' first and the adequate communication to put the action into the right context.
Read the whole article in the FT, "Communications a deafening silence".
Monday, November 27, 2006
Where is the fortune at the bottom

Mallen Baker brings this interesting discussion about Prahalads thesis of the Fortune at the bottom of the Pyramid.
Read the whole article
You find more details about the book on Amazon.
Toys behave badly

Toys R Us is pointed out... in the swiss media. The company got bad ratings for producing some of their puppets in China. And they do not want talk to the press. Definitely, not the right behaviour to foster confidence and trust.
More interestingly, the journalists also points out the various dilemmas: Consumers don't want to buy expensive toys, consumers don't have the information (they don't know how the puppets were produced), furthermore the standards for such ratings are not very clear etc.
But one thing seems clear to me: Hiding from the press is no good anyway. You get the bad role.
You can read the article of the Tages-Anzeiger online, if you handle the german ;-)
Saturday, November 11, 2006
WBCSD -

I had to add the link of this important site: The World Business Council for Sustainable Development is an important actor, helping to create awareness among governments and the business community that sustainable development and commerce can go hand in hand... and that the climate issue is as serious one (for those who did not notice)As it says on their website, at the Nairobi Conference the council will present 'possible options for action to urgently adress the climat and energy challenges':
The WBCSD calls on governments to create the predictable long-term framework conditions required for business to invest in a sustainable energy future.More details can be read in their report Energy & Climate - A contribution to the dialogue on long term cooperative action (
Saturday, October 28, 2006
Online Special on CSR from Germany
You find interesting thematic online-special on CSR at the Competence Site. Many contributions of matter experts and practicioners explore the different sides of CSR giving a european and german perspective to the debate. Of course, all in german ;-)
Sunday, August 13, 2006
Coop and WWF

For Switzerland, this is a first one: One of the big retailers engaged in a partnership with Coop and agreed to strengthen its measures to protect the environment: promote environment-friendly products, improve their declaration...
Yeah, the competition is getting tougher also in swiss-retail-business with the soon coming competitors and discounters: Aldi and Lidl.
A success for the WWF and a temptative from Coop to distinguish itself on the market with a 'somewhat' greener image than the others. It will be interesting to see what the other big player (Migros) will do.
And definitely it will be up to us - the consumers - to support such responsible corporate action.
More details...
Friday, July 14, 2006
The poisoned pill: make money or save lives?

In an interesting article Mallen consider the huge CSR challenge that pharmaceutical companies face in Africa against the background of the Aids epidemic. Make money or save lives?
How to combine patient relief and profit-driven business practices in a context of poor countries with weak health infrastructures?
There has already been gone a lot of action and thinking into this. Just consider the two what the MSF campaign Access to Essential Medicines has done and said with respect to that.
Focusing and advocating for exclusively on more research for rare diseases the DNDi website - the Drugs for neglected diseases initiatives - is worht a visit.
It is obvious that there is need for more debate, thinking and committement to progress towards a better way to deal with this huge challenge. I am quite sure that this issue will push CSR even more on the agenda of top-management and develop the thinking and practises of CSR - at least within the pharmaceutical industry. Next opportunity for this, will be in september at the international expert conference in Basel: "Access to Life-Saving Medication". The conference is organized by the Basel Institute on Governance.
No time for CSR
Businesses are owned by their shareholders - any money they spend on so-called social responsibility is effectively theft from those shareholders who can, after all, decide for themselves if they want to give to charity.
On of the arguments against Corporate Social Responsiblilty on Mallenbaker.netThe site proposes to think about the arguments in order to find the best responses. Definitely a good exercise. The central error in the above argument is, that investing in CSR is not simply giving money away to charity. Managing an enterprise is managing relationships with multiple stakeholders, relationships that can strongly influence - on the long-term - the "licence to operate". These relationships can be expressed under the concept of reputation. For instance, consider the case of Coca-Cola, where its "Reputation"- the market-capitalization - exceeds by far the "property value" of the Company. In particular, in case of Coca-Cola, where about 96% of its value is made of intangibles, the argument goes on.
Read other arguments.
Saturday, June 10, 2006
NGOs returning to Activist roots?

An interesting post on Edelman blog on whether US NGO's are maturing or returning militant roots. Of course, the background is an survey carried out by the Edelman agency, but still very intersting... as you can read...:
"In Edelman/Harvard/IBLF survey of Fortune 500 companies, global NGOs, global media and institutional investors, all agreed that MNC should view less-developed markets as an opportunity to grow market and increase shareholder value.There are a few issues for business to consider in this environment:
1) Is a company ready to make a long-term commitment? There is no easy exit strategy once you are committed.
2) Can the company outline a plan to self sufficiency for the social actors? For example, Rajiv Gupta of McKinsey eloquently described a plan to increase the supply of health workers in India, which began with a think tank on public health to affect public policy, creating institutes for public health and making health a respected and desireable profession.
3) Can the company identify its areas of core competence (logistics, marketing, management) and how it can work along side NGOs who do the actual service delivery (note that companies are not credible actors in public interaction and are too vulnerable to political pressures). "
